THE INFORMATION SPOT
.........Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to My AOL ........
Showing posts with label War and Terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War and Terrorism. Show all posts
8 Nov 2012

What Islam says about Social Relations?

0 comments
 
21st century is the century of globalization. The interaction among civilizations and different beliefs is being increased day by day. After the incident of 9/11, misunderstandings were created among believers of different religions, especially, the religion Islam faced heavy criticisms, because the terrorists were labeled as Muslims.
After this, different terms like radical Islam, moderate Islam, and political Islam etc came into being. The dilemma is that, the inventors of such terms and concepts are totally unaware of the teachings of Islam, and they are creating a negative image of Islam in front of the world, because when they talk about a radical Islam or a political Islam, the general public supposes Islam to be an ideology of racism, radicalism etc. On the other hand, the terrorists who associate themselves to Islam are causing a huge destruction of not only the world but also the image of this peaceful religion.
At this stage, where inter-cultural and inter-faith relations` state is not satisfactory, it is extremely essential to bring in front of the world the true commands of Islam about social relations, so that people may become able to decide for themselves about what is rightly and what is wrongly said about Islam.
I have tried to put some of the sayings of the Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him), which are the commands for Muslims and a guidance for the whole world. These sayings are about forgiveness mercy and for reconciliation of hearts. And these characteristics are opposite to terror and hatred. One must know the true values of Islam so that he can make a true and fair opinion on this sensitive issue.
Following are some of the worthy Sayings of Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him):
A. Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) said, "Whoever has three things, Allah (God) will take his account with ease and will enter him in Paradise} (with His mercy):
1. Mend relations with those who try to break off ties with you.
2. Endow those who deprive you; and
3. Forgive those who are unjust towards you.
B. Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) said, "charity does not lessen the wealth and if a person forgives someone`s mistake, then Allah (God) increases his honor and respect." Whoever adopts humbleness for Allah, Allah elevates his ranks. "
C. Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) said, Whoever is not merciful to others, will not receive mercy; whoever does not forgive, will not be forgiven. "
D. Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) said, "The best manners of the world and the Hereafter are that you associate with those who disassociate with you, and forgive those who do injustices to you and whoever wishes for an extended life and abundance of sustenance should treat his relatives with kindness. "
E. Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) said, have mercy on others and you will be showered with mercy and adopt forgiveness and Allah (God) will forgive you. "
Islam does not teach terrorism or radicalism, rather it negates hatred and conflicts. Islam came here in this world not to kill but it prevents to kill. It reveals to create a strong harmony, to teach mercy, to promote forgiveness. I appeal to the opinion makers, please first study and then make an opinion. Discussion, debate and research are the only ways through which we can join each others` hands to move forward towards a peaceful society in which a gun is not a solution.

Syed Talal Hassan Bukhari
talal.hassan5@gmail.com


   
You Might Also Like:
Readmore...
25 Oct 2012

Researchers Are Taking Human Surveillance To Another Level By Developing Mosquito Sized Spy Drones

0 comments
 
With all the negative news flying around these days concerning drones – and the potential negative constitutional impact they will ultimately have on American society – now comes news that researchers are taking the surveillance society up a notch by shrinking the observation platform.

Dramatically.

It may sound like something out of the science-fiction hopper at your local DVD rental machine, but scientists are trying to engineer a drone that is no bigger than a bug. A team of researchers at the vaunted Johns Hopkins University – in conjunction with the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Arlington, Va. – is helping develop what they are calling an MAV (micro aerial vehicle) that will no doubt have loads of uses, up to and including the usurpation of privacy rights by the Leviathan State.

Initially though, it’s thought that MAVs will be incorporated for use by the military, for situations when stealth is of the utmost importance. The tiny drones could effortlessly infiltrate urban areas, where dense concentrations of buildings and people, along with unpredictable winds and other obstacles make it impractical, if not impossible, to use a standard-sized drone. Domestic uses include search-and-rescue operations and, of course, observation.

How small, exactly? Well, a graphic on the site of the Air Force research agency features what looks to be an electronic mosquito. That’s pretty small – though officially, the agency says such micro vehicles could be larger.

They’re not bug-sized yet, but they’re out there

“A MAV is a flight vehicle about two feet in length or smaller, capable of operating below rooftop level in an urban environment. It may have a fixed wing, rotary wing (helicopter), flapping wing, or possibly no wings,” the Air Force says. “One of the primary missions driving MAV development is the need to fill the covert close-in sensing requirement. This requirement demands that MAVs be able to covertly find, track, and target adversaries while operating in complex urban environments.”

How possible is it to build such machines? Very possible. In fact, according a 2009 Air Force press release, a French researcher funded by the European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, in London, and the French ministry of defense “has designed a rugged micro air vehicle (MAV) that is attractive to the U.S. Air Force because of its high aerodynamic efficiency, even in adverse conditions.”

Dr. Jean-Marc Moschetta, professor of aerodynamics at the Institut Superieur de l’Aeronautique et de l’espace in Toulouse, France created what he calls the MAVion – a 30-centimeter fixed wing MAV that can make a rapid transition between flight and hover, both features which are attractive for military and commercial use.

“The ultimate goal of the MAVion concept is to demonstrate a two-fold capability using the same vehicle: fast forward flight and hover flight,” Moschetta said.

Since then, the focus on MAVs has evolved. Student researchers Tras Lin and Lingxiao Zheng, who are leading the Johns Hopkins contribution to MAV research, are using high-speed video cameras to examine how a butterfly moves in flight. The cameras give the team the ability to separate one-fifth of a second movement into about 600 frames, showing them how the insect maneuvers and moves its body to make the kinds of sudden moves it can make.

Concept has long been studied

Other defense agencies are working on similar technology.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency just last year released photos of a small, mega-lightweight, remote-controlled flying vehicle called a Hummingbird that was designed to mimic the bird in flight. Specifically, the vehicle was designed to give American troops the capability to see around corners and look inside buildings to spot enemy forces.

That project likely stemmed from a 1999 report by the Foreign Military Studies Office at Ft. Leavenworth, Kan., detailing the military’s interest in improving combat conditions for U.S. forces in urban environments.

“From early history on, urban combat has required masses of dismounted infantrymen, a significant amount of time, combined arms and astonishing quantities of ammunition,” the report summarized. “The assaulting force runs the risk of its own attrition by combat, insufficient supplies and epidemic diseases. Assaults on cities have resulted in heavy military and civilian casualties and shattered cities. Modern, urban combat has often destroyed operations’ tempo, drained logistics stockpiles and ruined the reputations of promising commanders.”

MAVs may be under development for all the right reasons, but they sure carry with them the possibility they may be used for all the wrong reasons.



Subscribe for Latest Updates
Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner
Readmore...
17 Oct 2012

Is Media Playing With Our Thoughts And Beliefs?

3 comments
 
Media has now become an integral part of our life. There is no doubt on it being very advantageous and helpful as you are getting all kinds of information about happenings in the whole world by just sitting on your sofa and enjoying cup of tea while watching TV or reading a magazine or newspaper.

But I would like to draw your attention towards some of the aspects thereof which can cause misunderstandings and can also modify our overall beliefs and perceptions. I am just going to share what goes through my mind every time.

Readmore...
10 Oct 2012

Why unequal treatment for the same crime?

1 comments
 

The west does not lose any opportunity to blow things out of proportion if things go wrong in the Muslim world. The latest example is that of a poor and sick Christian girl who has been accused of blasphemy for burning pages of the Holy Quran, a sacred book for the world Muslims. This case is sub judice. There are more avenues open for the Christian community up to the Supreme Court. This Court and the Provincial High Courts are independent. However, a campaign is on the way to seek the signatures on a petition for forwarding it to the President of Pakistan. Until this moment a million, including many Muslims, have signed it.

From the days of President Reagan, the west has been haunted by ‘Islamophobia’. No one knows its origin. Islam means ‘PEACE’.  However, no religion in the world has been badly as maligned as Islam. And no other religion has been as widely discussed as Islam. Discussion on Islam is high on the agenda for US Congress debates. The case of the poor and under privileged Christian girl might become the number one topic of the US Presidential debates. Americans such as Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Newt Gringrich, Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart etc. are rabid Islam haters. Not only that a woman in the USA ran away from the hospital shouting that Muslims are found everywhere in the country. 

But why the west is provoking the Muslims by attacking them, their Holy Quran, their Holy Prophet (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him), the rites and symbols. The latest is the judgment of the American court of acquitting American forces of defiling the Holy Quran. Incidents of burning the Holy Quran had taken place last year and this year. Caricatures of the Holy Prophet (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him) were made in Denmark and a movie was made on him in the Netherlands.

Mahfooz ur Rahman
rahman.mahfooz.pk@gmail.com
Readmore...
8 Oct 2012

Imran Khan hails commitment of youth at Tank rally

 
PTI Chief Imran Khan (C) addresses supporters as he stands on a vehicle during a rally in Mianwali, northern Pakistan, on October 6, 2012.  –AFP PHOTO

TANK: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s Chief Imran Khan addressed crowds gathered in Tank on Sunday after being disallowed by authorities from entering South Waziristan.

READ MORE......
Readmore...
4 Nov 2011

Bin Laden had Already Died in 2001

0 comments
 

Usama bin Laden had already died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication in year 2001, as per Fox News published on December 26, 2001. The News is given in italics as under.
Readmore...
27 Jan 2009

Swift justice of Taliban

0 comments
 


Swift justice of Taliban
Dr Ghayur Ayub

It was during a visit to Peshawar that I met a senior police officer. He narrated a story which was brow-raising. He told of a person from Bannu who lent Rs 40,000/ to a man he knew, who promised that he would return it within a specified time. He told the borrower that he had saved up the said amount to help pay for his children's education. When the agreed time lapsed, he asked him to return the amount. The borrower started making excuses and after a few months he flatly refused and challenged the lender to do what ever he could. There is a Pukhtu word for it 'Laas Da Azaad De' The man went from pillar to post to seek justice but with no result. The police proved incapable as the borrower was a powerful man with strong connections. When he tried to knock on the door of the court for justice he was dismayed to hear that it would take months for the case to come to a hearing and years to reach a final judgment. After all that, the chances were that the verdict would go against him as he was up against powerful people. To top it off, he was told he had to pay Rs 1000/ upfront every time he wanted to put his case forward for a hearing. This amount did not include the amount he was going to pay the lawyers. When he calculated it, the approximate amount turned out to be more than the actual amount he was going to seek justice for. At the end of every day, he would go back home heart broken; cursing his luck to be living in a country where there was no justice for the middle or poor classes. He tried to persuade the borrower by pleading with him, explaining how desperately he needed the money for his children's education. He even offered a discount or to split the amount into instalments, but all in vain. It was like hitting a brick wall. He felt dejected, helpless and powerless to see his children suffering just because he came from a strata of a society pushed against the wall. One evening, he heard a knock on the door. He opened it and saw two strangers with bushy beards standing outside. Thinking they were there to collect 'Chanda', he asked with irritation what they wanted. They told him that they saw him crying in the mosque and on enquiry they were told that someone was refusing to pay his money back. With a surprised look on his face, he asked them who they were. "We are local Taliban" Then they asked if he would let them have his side of story. He saw a ray of hope and ushered them in. After listening to his story, the Taliban told him that the borrower had committed an un-Islamic act, and if he wanted they could persuade him to return the said money. "We want your permission". His heart jumped with flickering optimism and immense joy and without any hesitation, he gave them his consent. Before they left the premises they asked for 72 hours. According to the police officer, the Taliban went to the influential man and told him it was un-Islamic not to pay the amount he had borrowed from the man. They threatened that if he did not pay the debt back within 48 hours; he would bear the consequences. They also told him how Taliban had previously dealt with people like him. Shivers went through the spine of the 'powerful' man as he knew what their threat meant. With a dry mouth, frightened face and shaking body he nodded his head in agreement, promising he would return the amount. The next day, he went to the house of the lender and paid back the full amount he had refused up until then. He apologised for the delay and requested him to tell the Taliban not to harm him or his family and to let them know that he had returned the money. The Taliban never went back to ask whether he got the money back, but they must had been watching the development. From that day on, according to the police officer, that man became a strong supporter of Taliban. Could anyone blame him?

Another related story about quick and effective justice comes from the Bugti tribe of Baluchistan. According to electronic media, a man named Nazim Ali was refused his share in a dispute. According to him, he spent a lot of money to get justice from the court but failed because of corrupt practices. So he went to the tribal chief who referred him to the Jirga. The Jirga decided that he should walk on fire and if he was telling the truth he would not be burnt. Nazim Ali agreed to it and in front of onlookers he walked on red hot coal. After the walk, people saw that his soles were not burnt. The chief decided in his favour and he was given his due share.

There are countless other stories of parallel justice systems running in Pakistan in the present day. These systems seem to be nippy and effective satisfying their poor clients. Some are Taliban style, others tribal style sharing one commonality; they are swift, just and not stained with corruption. The question is; do we see fair and quick justice provided to the poor clients in our judicial systems? I am not a legal expert but from what I read in the print media and saw on the electronic media, the case of Farah Dogar is a glaring example of lopsided justice. Justice plays important part in the building of a nation to prosperity. A nation can only grow if its judicial system carries justice independently with desired honesty. Both these qualities seem to be missing in our present justice system. It is not only sad but painful too. In my discussions with different walks of people living in the troubled parts of FATA and NWFP (Pakhtunkhwa) the vast majority agreed that the justice provided by Taliban is fair and quick. They might not agree with other activities related to Talibanisation such as discouraging western education, burning of schools, gender discrimination etc; but they do appreciate the provision of justice served at the doorsteps with efficiency, audacity and honesty. Swift justice is the major achievement which attracts the poor people of Pakistan to Taliban.

Readmore...
18 Jan 2009

A Glance of What is Going on in GAZA

0 comments
 




















































Readmore...

To International Blinds and Deafs like UK, US, UN, CNN, BBC, UK, Human Rights, Bush, Obama all supporters and killers of Muslims Childern

0 comments
 

To International Blinds and Deafs like UK, US, UN, CNN, BBC, UK, Bush, Obama
Please Contact Sameh Habib, the owner of blog GazaToday. See his first hand pictures of dead children. I wish if Muslim ruling elite and puppets of the US/West, who welcomes Mr. Boucher and Mr. Biden and gave them their countries most prestigious award could also show them these pictures and ask them this question:
How the world's biggest democrats could also be Killers of Children?
I am sorry for these Muslim and Islam children that we can't do anything for them except pray. They have Mehmud Abbas and traitors/puppets in Saudia, Egypt, Jordan while we have CIA agents like Musharaf, Mehmud Durrani, Asif Zardari, Karzai, Haqqani, and God knows who else, sold out people backed by these child killers.
Sameh A. Habeeb's reports:a journalist from Gaza blogs on "Gaza Today" http://www.gazatoday.blogspot.com/.
Breaking News: In Gaza: No water, No beans, No fruits, No chicken, No rice, No bread, No Markets, No shops, No Medicines, No medical Machines, No enough Doctors, No enough ambulances, No fuel, No gas, no beans, no candlelight, No power, No Internet, No commutation, No aspects of.What's available is few amounts for domestic use inside houses.
Have a look on my story about Gaza Children!http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/The-Innocent-Child-Victims-of-The-Gaza-War/Media-Gallery/200901215199483?lpos=Home_News_in_Picture_Home_Region_0&lid=GALLERY_15199483_The_Innocent_Child_Victims_of_The_Gaza_War
By: Sameh A. Habeeb
Dear Editors, Journalists and Friends,
I have got more calls from anonymous persons stop blogging or I would be killed. Yet, I would keep on this track. Some of you do wonder how I send news in such conditions. I really suffer a lot to send you this update due to lack of power. I go around 4 kilo meters a day in this cruel war where I charge my laptop battery to be able to send this work! This is very risky since shells rain down and drones hover over me! I will keep this up.
PLUS
I'm available 24 hours for media coverage in occupied Gaza.For more reporting, breaking news, interviews and accounts in Gaza, reach me on my contact info below. Please try both numbers below because there is a big problem in communication result of Israeli power cuts. You could reach me any time in my house. welcome to call me on this number in the night: Landline: 0097282802825
Mob: 00972599306096Landline: 0097282802825
Sameh A. Habeeb, B.A.Photo journalist & Peace Activist Humanitarian, Child Relief Worker Gaza Strip, Palestine Mob: 00972599306096Tel: 0097282802825 E-mail: Sam_hab@hotmail.comSameh.habeeb@gmail.com Skype: Gazatoday, Facebook: Sameh A. habeebWeb: www.gazatoday.blogspot.com Daily Photos: http://picasaweb.google.com/sameh.habeeb
Readmore...
16 Jan 2009

ISRAEL Violating International Law & The Media Cover-Up

1 comments
 
Readmore...

A JEWISH Rabbi telling the truth about Gaza (Palestine)

0 comments
 
Readmore...
15 Jan 2009

Top 5 Lies About Israel’s Assault on Gaza

0 comments
 
Top 5 Lies About Israel's Assault on Gaza January 3, 2009by Jeremy R. Hammond

Lie #1) Israel is only targeting legitimate military sites and is seeking to protect innocent lives. Israel never targets civilians.
The Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated pieces of property in the world. The presence of militants within a civilian population does not, under international law, deprive that population of their protected status, and hence any assault upon that population under the guise of targeting militants is, in fact, a war crime.
Moreover, the people Israel claims are legitimate targets are members of Hamas, which Israel says is a terrorist organization. Hamas has been responsible for firing rockets into Israel. These rockets are extremely inaccurate and thus, even if Hamas intended to hit military targets within Israel, are indiscriminate by nature. When rockets from Gaza kill Israeli civilians, it is a war crime.
Hamas has a military wing. However, it is not entirely a military organization, but a political one. Members of Hamas are the democratically elected representatives of the Palestinian people. Dozens of these elected leaders have been kidnapped and held in Israeli prisons without charge. Others have been targeted for assassination, such as Nizar Rayan, a top Hamas official. To kill Rayan, Israel targeted a residential apartment building. The strike not only killed Rayan but two of his wives and four of his children, along with six others. There is no justification for such an attack under international law. This was a war crime.
Other of Israel's bombardment with protected status under international law have included a mosque, a prison, police stations, and a university, in addition to residential buildings.
Moreover, Israel has long held Gaza under siege, allowing only the most minimal amounts of humanitarian supplies to enter. Israel is bombing and killing Palestinian civilians. Countless more have been wounded, and cannot receive medical attention. Hospitals running on generators have little or no fuel. Doctors have no proper equipment or medical supplies to treat the injured. These people, too, are the victims of Israeli policies targeted not at Hamas or legitimate military targets, but directly designed to punish the civilian population.
Lie #2) Hamas violated the cease-fire. The Israeli bombardment is a response to Palestinian rocket fire and is designed to end such rocket attacks.
Israel never observed the cease-fire to begin with. From the beginning, it announced a "special security zone" within the Gaza Strip and announced that Palestinians who enter this zone will be fired upon. In other words, Israel announced its intention that Israeli soldiers would shoot at farmers and other individuals attempting to reach their own land in direct violation of not only the cease-fire but international law.
Despite shooting incidents, including ones resulting in Palestinians getting injured, Hamas still held to the cease-fire from the time it went into effect on June 19 until Israel effectively ended the truce on November 4 by launching an airstrike into Gaza that killed five and injured several others.
Israel's violation of the cease-fire predictably resulted in retaliation from militants in Gaza who fired rockets into Israel in response. The increased barrage of rocket fire at the end of December is being used as justification for the continued Israeli bombardment, but is a direct response by militants to the Israeli attacks.
Israel's actions, including its violation of the cease-fire, predictably resulted in an escalation of rocket attacks against its own population.
Lie #3) Hamas is using human shields, a war crime.
There has been no evidence that Hamas has used human shields. The factis, as previously noted, Gaza is a small piece of property that is densely populated. Israel engages in indiscriminate warfare such as the assassination of Nizar Rayan, in which members of his family were also murdered. It is victims like his dead children that Israel defines as "human shields" in its propaganda. There is no legitimacy for this interpretation under international law. In circumstances such as these, Hamas is not using human shields, Israel is committing war crimes in violation of the Geneva Conventions and other applicable international law.
Lie #4) Arab nations have not condemned Israel's actions because they understand Israel's justification for its assault.
The populations of those Arab countries are outraged at Israel's actions and at their own governments for not condemning Israel'sassault and acting to end the violence. Simply stated, the Arab governments do not represent their respective Arab populations. The populations of the Arab nations have staged mass protests in opposition to not only Israel's actions but also the inaction of their own governments and what they view as either complacency or complicity in Israel's crimes.
Moreover, the refusal of Arab nations to take action to come to the aid of the Palestinians is not because they agree with Israel'sactions, but because they are submissive to the will of the US, which fully supports Israel. Egypt, for instance, which refused to open the border to allow Palestinians wounded in the attacks to get medical treatment in Egyptian hospitals, is heavily dependent upon US aid, and is being widely criticized within the population of the Arab countries for what is viewed as an absolute betrayal of the Gaza Palestinians.
Even Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has been regarded as a traitor to his own people for blaming Hamas for the suffering of the people of Gaza. Palestinians are also well aware of Abbas' past perceived betrayals in conniving with Israel and the US to sideline the democratically elected Hamas government, culminating in a counter-coup by Hamas in which it expelled Fatah (the military wing of Abbas' Palestine Authority) from the Gaza Strip. While his apparent goal was to weaken Hamas and strengthen his own position, the Palestinians and other Arabs in the Middle East are so outraged at Abbas that it is unlikely he will be able to govern effectively.
Lie #5) Israel is not responsible for civilian deaths because it warned the Palestinians of Gaza to flee areas that might be targeted.
Israel claims it sent radio and telephone text messages to residents of Gaza warning them to flee from the coming bombardment. But the people of Gaza have nowhere to flee to. They are trapped within the Gaza Strip. It is by Israeli design that they cannot escape across the border. It is by Israeli design that they have no food, water, or fuel by which to survive. It is by Israeli design that hospitals in Gaza have no electricity and few medical supplies with which to treat the injured and save lives. And Israel has bombed vast areas of Gaza,targeting civilian infrastructure and other sites with protected status under international law. No place is safe within the Gaza Strip.
Jeremy R. Hammond is the editor of Foreign Policy Journal, a website dedicated to providing news, critical analysis, and opinion commentary on U.S. foreign policy from outside of the standard framework offered by government officials and the mainstream corporate media, particularly with regard to the "war on terrorism" and events in the Middle East. He has also written for numerous other online publications. You can contact him at jeremy@foreignpolicyjournal.com.

Readmore...

Wake Up, Indians, It’s A Cover Up

0 comments
 
Do you really believe these cock and bull stories? This is not a James Bond thriller, unless living in ‘Bollywood’ has made you all live in a make-believe world. Tell me: is this not the height of incompetence or is there a massive cover up going on by your government?

By Humayun Gauhar
Tuesday, 9 December 2008.
WWW.AHMEDQURAISHI.COM

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—Say a prayer for India.

Last weekend was the 16th anniversary of the demolition of the Babri Mosque by Hindu fascists, egged on and led by L.K. Advani, the current leader of the Hindu fundamentalist BJP.

Whoever it was that said that one can choose one’s friends but not one’s neighbors was spot on. The Indian neighbors that we are landed with need telling some home truths by way of lessons after their near-demented response to the Mumbai Mayhem.

Ask them: don’t you think that there is a massive cover up going on? Else why would your commandoes obliterate all chances of the militants’ identities being discovered? They shot them through both eyes and obliterated their fingerprints because these, and DNA, can identify a person. Are your authorities trying to hide the fact that the militants were neither Pakistani nor Muslim but Hindu and Israeli? In subsequent articles I will give you Indian press clippings for every contention I make here. One would have thought that your government would be keen to discover the identities of these people. This was not mindless, but very clever brutality. Until one gets some logical reason for why this happened you cannot blame me for thinking that there is indeed a massive cover up in progress and that your irresponsible prime minister and foreign minister rushed to finger Pakistan to divert public anger from itself. Without proof the latter told Condoleezza Rice that, “there is no doubt the terrorists were individuals who came from Pakistan and whose controllers are in Pakistan.” Condi to her credit replied that she would not “jump to any conclusions about who is responsible.”

So here’s some unsolicited advice, but before you see red at this “damn Muslim” from “puny little Pakistan” with the temerity to give you gratuitous advice and jump on my back, do read this once and then again the next day and then tear it up if you still want. When you are humiliated, don’t react like a still colonized people. It’s tiresome. You won independence, not after 90 years of slavery as we did, but after a millennium. During all this time you managed to retain your religious majority. That’s quite an achievement, something to be proud of, though do acknowledge that if your Muslim rulers had “spread Islam by the sword” most of you would have been Muslims. So get over it and get over yourself and the false secular image that you have created of India and start dealing with the reality that you are citizens of ‘Hindustan’ – ‘Land of the Hindus’. You will do yourself a great favor by publicly acknowledging this truth.

Putting the blame on Pakistan for anything and everything has become the standard operating procedure of your fanciful politicians. Is it to hide the fact that you have rampant homegrown militancy and freedom movements in your country? It doesn’t work. You try and ethnically cleanse 150 million Muslims and then you are surprised when you get it in the neck? Is it revenge for centuries of Muslim rule? Get over it.

Don’t ignore what I said last week: state terrorism begets non-state terrorism. You should honestly see the degree of state terrorism your country has indulged in, not just against Muslims but also against other minorities, Sikhs and Christians particularly, and the ‘Untouchables’. You should also consider how much terrorism you have fomented in all your neighboring countries.

I’m going to try and help you, Indian neighbors, to focus on the bizarre stories that I have been able to piece together from your newspapers and then ask you some questions to help you think logically.

It goes something like this. Your intelligence agency intercepted a phone conversation that some “cargo” was soon to be delivered by ship from Karachi. It asked the Indian Navy and Coast Guard (who were involved in a joint exercise on – and perhaps also in – the Arabian Sea at the time to practice for just such an event) to intercept the boat. The militants hijacked a fishing trawler and, amazingly, managed to evade the Indian Navy and Coast Guard in full cry. Near Mumbai they boarded some rubber dinghies – the number varies from 2, 3, 6 and 7.

One version has it that three rubber dinghies landed at a deserted beach near Mumbai and the militants waded and walked through marsh and tall reeds and took taxis to get to the city. A second says that one dinghy landed at a pier in the heart of Mumbai. Indian police at the pier saw them and said that they took taxis and went away. A third version says that people saw 6 to 7 dinghies land at Colaba beach near the Nariman Building which is Israeli owned and operated and only Jews can live there. Ten young men unload boxes and went into it. Were they Israelis? One Indian security officer who went in was shocked to see that they were white. We know that your and Israel’s security forces have been in joint venture for years. Was it them, perhaps? A huge quantity of food had been purchased and was awaiting the militants before their arrival in the Nariman Building. Was it your commandoes who killed the Jewish rabbi, his wife and other Israelis/Jews there to prevent them from talking? It is also suggested that the militants were connected to Somali pirates who wanted revenge from the Indian Navy for the killings of their fellow pirates earlier on the Arabian Seas. A senior naval officer of yours, however, has named the ship that was allegedly hijacked as M V Alpha. On enquiry it was found that it is a Panamanian flag carrier, not Pakistani, and its captain says that his vessel was never hijacked.

Do you really believe these cock and bull stories? This is not a James Bond thriller, unless living in ‘Bollywood’ has made you all live in a make-believe world. Tell me: is this not the height of incompetence or is there a massive cover up going on by your government?

There are so many holes in these stories. Onlookers remember the militants drinking beer just before the attacks. Would Muslims driven by religious zeal convinced that they are going to heaven drink alcohol before going to their deaths for crying out loud, even as a decoy? Not on your life. Initially Indian media said that some Britons of Pakistani origin were involved. Britain says that’s not true. RAW says they had already warned your authorities of an imminent attack. The Americans say they warned them twice. Yet all these warnings went unheeded. Why? Was someone in cahoots with the militants? Were these people not Muslims at all?

The militants knew all the joints well, which means that they must have inside (Indian) help. They took days to stash arms and ammunition in the hotels. Were your guys asleep or in cahoots? Don’t rule out the possibility that some of your army and intelligence people are involved with Hindu militant groups and MOSSAD to create open warfare between India’s Muslims and Hindus and bring our countries to the brink? The Israelis would love even more than India to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and such incidents would ‘justify’ an attack, so why not engineer them?

Is it possible that while on the one hand Indian authorities are so incompetent that they couldn’t prevent the attacks despite several warnings and on the other they could determine within hours that Pakistan was behind them? After Pakistanis were burned alive in the ‘Friendship Express’ India immediately blamed the ISI. It later transpired that a serving Lt. Colonel Srikant Purohit of the Indian Army and a Hindu fascist group did it. So why should we believe you this time? India’s Anti Terrorist Squad official who discovered Purohit’s involvement and was still investigating him was one of the first to be deliberately killed by your commandoes. To get him out of the way, before he uncovered more embarrassing truths? That his wife blamed your government for her husband’s murder and refused compensation is damning, what?

You guys always blame the ISI or its “rogue elements” or our army and some Jihadi groups. Your government has given us the same old list of 20 that includes the Indian underworld don Dawood Ibrahim. Our interior minister says India has given only 3 names: yet another Indian underworld don named Tiger Memon, Dawood Ibrahim and Maulana Masood Azhar. Without even an extradition treaty, you want us to “hand over” these 20 to you, no questions asked, no evidence furnished. Such is the thinking of a Mickey Mouse country.

Give us some hard evidence and if there is are Pakistanis or Pakistani connections involved we’ll fix their hash in Pakistan. You watch.
Why haven’t you given us the SIM that was allegedly found on the captured militant? A SIM has a near endless story to tell and each number found has its own story. We’ll trace them all. Lashkar-e-Tayba’s objective is liberating Kashmir; you know the part occupied by you. Then why on earth would the Mumbai militants demand the liberation of Hyderabad, Deccan, and not Kashmir, if they were Lashkar-e-Tayba? It doesn’t make sense.

Think, my Indian neighbors, think, if not for yours then at least for God’s sake, before we are all vaporized and our issues become of interest only to historians.

http://www.ahmedquraishi.com/article_detail.php?id=540


Readmore...

Shut Down CIA Station In Islamabad

0 comments
 
A war with Pakistan is India’s opportunity to legitimize action beyond its borders –which is what superpowers do – and launch its new career as a U.S.-propped [and Bollywood-propped] ‘superpower’. Pakistan will have to match the challenge or accept Indian hegemony for the rest of the century. And while at it, time for Pakistani government and military to order the closure of CIA station in the Pakistani capital. The new American agenda in the region contradicts Pakistani interests. How can this be done? Please learn how the Saudis dealt with Edward W. Genhm.

By Ahmed Quraishi
Wednesday, 24 December 2008.
WWW.AHMEDQURAISHI.COM

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—Pakistan will have to learn from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other U.S. friendly nations how to push back American interference. This is important for us to be able to also understand how to push back the Indians. India appears set to launch its new career as an interventionist power at Pakistan’s expense. It will fall to Pakistan to help the Indian warmongers understand the limits of their designs. Pakistan will need a government that can match and not succumb.

Indian provocations need to be matched. We need to also recognize that the rise in tensions in the region is happening with the direct nod from our ally, the United States. Pakistani appeasement has emboldened our detractors. Polite statements from the Pakistani leadership will not do. Sonia Gandhi and Pranab Mukherjee must be put in their places.

I saw this happen firsthand. Ambassador Edward W. Gnehm’s aggressive interference in Kuwaiti affairs was the first sign of United States’ coming preemptive policy in the Gulf region. It was 1992 and the U.S. military had just expelled Iraqi forces from the oil-rich emirate. ‘Skip’ Gnehm, as friends and colleagues called him, strutted all over the country encouraging Kuwaitis to limit the powers of the ruling family. He was so effective in exploiting Kuwait’s insecurities and extracting concessions that Washington decided in 1996 to appoint him in Riyadh. That’s when the coldest spell in Saudi-U.S. relations began. There was no American envoy in Riyadh for almost two years because the Saudis had put their feet down and refused to accept Mr. Gnehm’s papers. Washington had to budge eventually. The Turks and the Egyptians have also survived many U.S. attempts at belligerent arm twisting.

A word also about CIA presence in Pakistan. Several nations in the region moved after 9/11 to gradually limit the operations of secret CIA stations on their soil. That’s because governments became suspicious of American designs to redraw the borders in the Middle East. An old Cold War ally, CIA had now become a threat. There was a conflict of interest. In Pakistan, we have long entered that stage. CIA’s station office in Islamabad used to be one of the biggest. With the American policy of empowering anti-Pakistan elements in Afghanistan and the region in full swing, our American friends must begin to feel unwelcome in Pakistan’s corridors of power. The current Pakistani government needs to show as much concern about CIA presence here as it has shown on ISI to appease the Americans.

The Indian ‘evidence’ against Pakistan for Mumbai attacks is inadmissible in any court of law. Yet New Delhi is using it to bully Pakistan with full American and British support. Pakistani officials must understand that India wants to use Mumbai to launch a new career as an aggressive superpower. Mumbai is India’s opportunity to legitimize action beyond its borders, which is what superpowers do. Evidence here doesn’t matter.

Pakistan will have to either match Indian bullying or accept Indian hegemony for the rest of this century. President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani’s calm reactions to Indian provocations were partially acceptable in the initial stages. But there is no excuse now for turning the other cheek. Pakistani reluctance to call India’s bluff and forcefully present its case has emboldened the Indians. Beginning with the Indian blockade on Pakistan’s water from Kashmir, which is an act of war. Subsequent Indian actions, visa restrictions on Pakistanis, cancellation of talks, freezing sports events and harassing Pakistani visitors to India are all signs that New Delhi is convinced about Pakistani weakness. The weakness of the Pakistani government is feeding this misconception. Aside from some statements by our Foreign Minister, Pakistani officials are yet to pay the Indians in the same coin. We need to hear a stronger reaction to the childish and provocative statements of Ms. Gandhi and her foreign minister. Also, where is the government’s media machine? Is it all reserved for PPP anniversaries and events? When will the state-run media wake up and realize we are staring into a possible war? Why our media and diplomats abroad have failed to show the world the immature and bellicose behavior of the Indian government? Why no Pakistani official has come out to condemn how Pakistani artists and visitors to India were harassed and turned back? And why Indian movies are still playing in a cinema hall right next to Pakistani military headquarters?

It is also a matter of concern that the rise in Indian hostilities is coinciding with mysterious riots in Karachi, an ill timed attempt to generate controversy over renaming NWFP, and now the Balochistan chief minister’s sudden challenge to the rest of the country to prove Indian interference in the province, whose evidence was shared with no less than the U.S. military chief himself.

http://www.ahmedquraishi.com/latest_col.php?id=80



Readmore...
14 Jan 2009

Israeli Founder admits ILLEGALITY of ISRAEL

0 comments
 
ISRAELI founder David Bin Goryan himself admitted the ILLEGALITY of Israel by saying:



"If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with ISRAEL. That is natural: we have taken their country...We come from israel, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-semetism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. why should they accept that?"

Now you decide that who is the usurper.

Had there be rightiousness and justice in the world, such a state (which came into being by a founder who himself admitted that this state was formed with the foundation of cruelty and proned to deprive others from their basic rights) could not have been recognized by the World's Major Powers.
Readmore...
11 Jan 2009

What if Israel was the victim?

1 comments
 

What if Israel Was the Victim? What if the roles of Israel, Gaza, andmembers of the international community in the ongoing conflict werereversed? How would Americans and their government respond? by byJeremy R. Hammond

Gaza's offensive against Israel continued today, sharply escalatingwith a ground incursion that cut off the southern part of Israel fromthe north.

The Israeli death toll climbed past 400, at least 60 of whom werecivilians, according to UN estimates. 4 Palestinian civilians havebeen killed as a result of Jewish settlers firing rockets into Gaza inresponse to the military operation led by Hamas.

Cloud bursts with flaming smoke trails were seen over Israeli citiesas Hamas employed white phosphorus munitions. The use of suchmunitions as weapons targeting soldiers or civilians is prohibited byinternational law, but Hamas says it is only using the munitionslegally to provide a smokescreen for its ground offensive.

There have been reports of Israelis with chemical burns from thephosphorus rounds entering hospitals, but the reports could notindependently confirmed since Hamas has refused to allow any foreignjournalists to enter Israel.
The United States led an effort at the United Nations to issue aresolution calling for a cessation of hostilities, but the effort wasblocked by Russia. The Russian ambassador to the UN said, "We don'twant a one-sided cease-fire that would see Gaza end its operationsonly to allow Israel to continue firing rockets into Gaza. We areseeking a sustainable cease-fire."
Russia has repeatedly reiterated its demand for Israel to recognizeGaza's right to exist and renounce violence. Russia's foreign ministersaid earlier this week, "Israel is responsible for ending thecease-fire. Gaza has the right to self-defense. No nation would sit byand just watch as rockets exploded in their towns, hitting homes andschools, without a response. No country would tolerate that."
Israel's rocket attacks against Gaza sharply escalated after Gaza'soffensive began 9 days ago. Prior to that, no Palestinians had beenkilled since the cease-fire began last year on June 19. Israel's LaborParty led by Ehud Barak agreed to the truce in exchange for an easingof the siege of Israel by Gaza.
Barak is also the head of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF), which Hamaslists as a terrorist organization.
During the first week of the cease-fire, Hamas soldiers fired uponIsraeli farmers near the border in at least seven separate incidents.An 82-year old Jewish man was wounded in one of the incidents. The IDFclaimed that this was a violation of the cease-fire, but Hamasresponded by announcing a "special security zone" along the border inIsrael and warned that it would fire upon any Jews that entered thezone.
At the same time, Hamas also stepped up its operations against the IDFin the Negev region, stating that the cease-fire only applied tonorthern Israel. Two Jewish militants were killed in one targetedassassination.
Tzipi Livni's Kadima group responded by firing rockets into Gaza City.The Labor party urged Kadima to observe the cease-fire so that thesiege of Israel would be lifted. Hamas warned Barak that his partywould be held responsible for any rockets fired from Israel into Gazaby other groups and closed border crossings once again after a briefrespite in which it allowed several of trucks to cross into Israeldelivering humanitarian supplies.
The IDF claimed that Gaza's firing at Jewish civilians and closing ofthe borders was a violation of the cease-fire, but held to the truceuntil after November 4, when Hamas launched an airstrike into Israel,killing 4 militants and injuring several others. Hamas said the Jewishmilitants were digging a tunnel under the border in order to crossinto Gaza to kidnap a Hamas soldier. Hamas released satellite imageswith arrows pointing to what a spokesman said was the location of thetunnel. Hamas also blamed Barak's IDF for violating the cease-fire bylaunching rockets in response to its airstrike.
Human rights organizations have criticized Hamas for its policy ofblockading Israel, which they say had brought the Jewish people to thebrink of a humanitarian catastrophe. The present military offensivehas worsened the situation for Israelis, many of whom have noelectricity. Many bakeries in Israel have run out of bread and cannotmake more. Israel's overflowing hospitals are running out of fuel torun generators, and the blockade has prevented them from receivingmedical supplies which would assist in helping those injured in thepresent conflict.
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh yesterday rejected the charges, saying"There is no humanitarian crisis in Israel. The humanitarian situationin Israel is exactly as it should be."
Haniyeh also dismissed charges that Hamas forces were targetingcivilians in its operations. "Hamas does everything to prevent theloss of life of civilians," he said. "Israelis were even warned toleave areas where the terrorists are hiding. We are only targetingmilitants. It is Israel that is using human shields in violation ofinternational law. It is Israel which is responsible for the loss ofinnocent lives."
Critics of Hamas argue that Jews have no place to flee since Gaza hasclosed the borders and has bombed numerous targets deep within Israeliterritory so that no place is safe.
A top Israeli leader, Binyamin Netanyahu, was killed earlier this weekwhen Hamas targeted his apartment building. His wife, Sarah, and twosons, Yair and Avner, were also killed in the bombing.
The UN's estimate of 60 Israeli civilians killed counts only women andchildren, and is therefore only a minimum figure. The UN is unable toestimate the number of men that were combatants versus civilians andhas said this number is therefore likely to be extremely conservative.
Russia's Pravda newspaper reported today that most of the men arrivingat Israeli hospitals appeared to be civilians. Most seemed to becoming in with their wives and children who were injured along withthe men in Gaza's bombing raids. None were identified as members ofthe IDF.
Member states of the European Union criticized Russia's decision toveto any resolution calling for a cease-fire. Britain's Prime MinisterGordon Brown said, "We need an end to the violence now. The blame-gamecan continue afterward, but the immediate goal should be to stop thebloodshed."
A spokesman for the Kremlin said Hamas needed more time to root out"the infrastructure of terror" in Israel and to cripple the IDF'sability to fire rockets into Gaza towns. "Russia is leading the effortto achieve peace in the region," he said, by seeking "a sustainablecease-fire."
Jeremy R. Hammond is the editor of Foreign Policy Journal, a websitededicated to providing news, critical analysis, and opinion commentaryon U.S. foreign policy from outside of the standard framework offeredby government officials and the mainstream corporate media,particularly with regard to the "war on terrorism" and events in theMiddle East. He has also written for numerous other onlinepublications. You can contact him at jeremy@foreignpolicyjournal.com.------------------------------------------






Top 5 Lies About Israel's Assault on GazaJanuary 3, 2009by Jeremy R. Hammond

Lie #1) Israel is only targeting legitimate military sites and isseeking to protect innocent lives. Israel never targets civilians.
The Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated pieces of propertyin the world. The presence of militants within a civilian populationdoes not, under international law, deprive that population of theirprotected status, and hence any assault upon that population under theguise of targeting militants is, in fact, a war crime.
Moreover, the people Israel claims are legitimate targets are membersof Hamas, which Israel says is a terrorist organization. Hamas hasbeen responsible for firing rockets into Israel. These rockets areextremely inaccurate and thus, even if Hamas intended to hit militarytargets within Israel, are indiscriminate by nature. When rockets fromGaza kill Israeli civilians, it is a war crime.
Hamas has a military wing. However, it is not entirely a militaryorganization, but a political one. Members of Hamas are thedemocratically elected representatives of the Palestinian people.Dozens of these elected leaders have been kidnapped and held inIsraeli prisons without charge. Others have been targeted forassassination, such as Nizar Rayan, a top Hamas official. To killRayan, Israel targeted a residential apartment building. The strikenot only killed Rayan but two of his wives and four of his children,along with six others. There is no justification for such an attackunder international law. This was a war crime.
Other of Israel's bombardment with protected status underinternational law have included a mosque, a prison, police stations,and a university, in addition to residential buildings.
Moreover, Israel has long held Gaza under siege, allowing only themost minimal amounts of humanitarian supplies to enter. Israel isbombing and killing Palestinian civilians. Countless more have beenwounded, and cannot receive medical attention. Hospitals running ongenerators have little or no fuel. Doctors have no proper equipment ormedical supplies to treat the injured. These people, too, are thevictims of Israeli policies targeted not at Hamas or legitimatemilitary targets, but directly designed to punish the civilianpopulation.
Lie #2) Hamas violated the cease-fire. The Israeli bombardment is aresponse to Palestinian rocket fire and is designed to end such rocketattacks.
Israel never observed the cease-fire to begin with. From thebeginning, it announced a "special security zone" within the GazaStrip and announced that Palestinians who enter this zone will befired upon. In other words, Israel announced its intention thatIsraeli soldiers would shoot at farmers and other individualsattempting to reach their own land in direct violation of not only thecease-fire but international law.
Despite shooting incidents, including ones resulting in Palestiniansgetting injured, Hamas still held to the cease-fire from the time itwent into effect on June 19 until Israel effectively ended the truceon November 4 by launching an airstrike into Gaza that killed five andinjured several others.
Israel's violation of the cease-fire predictably resulted inretaliation from militants in Gaza who fired rockets into Israel inresponse. The increased barrage of rocket fire at the end of Decemberis being used as justification for the continued Israeli bombardment,but is a direct response by militants to the Israeli attacks.
Israel's actions, including its violation of the cease-fire,predictably resulted in an escalation of rocket attacks against itsown population.
Lie #3) Hamas is using human shields, a war crime.
There has been no evidence that Hamas has used human shields. The factis, as previously noted, Gaza is a small piece of property that isdensely populated. Israel engages in indiscriminate warfare such asthe assassination of Nizar Rayan, in which members of his family werealso murdered. It is victims like his dead children that Israeldefines as "human shields" in its propaganda. There is no legitimacyfor this interpretation under international law. In circumstances suchas these, Hamas is not using human shields, Israel is committing warcrimes in violation of the Geneva Conventions and other applicableinternational law.
Lie #4) Arab nations have not condemned Israel's actions because theyunderstand Israel's justification for its assault.
The populations of those Arab countries are outraged at Israel'sactions and at their own governments for not condemning Israel'sassault and acting to end the violence. Simply stated, the Arabgovernments do not represent their respective Arab populations. Thepopulations of the Arab nations have staged mass protests inopposition to not only Israel's actions but also the inaction of theirown governments and what they view as either complacency or complicityin Israel's crimes.
Moreover, the refusal of Arab nations to take action to come to theaid of the Palestinians is not because they agree with Israel'sactions, but because they are submissive to the will of the US, whichfully supports Israel. Egypt, for instance, which refused to open theborder to allow Palestinians wounded in the attacks to get medicaltreatment in Egyptian hospitals, is heavily dependent upon US aid, andis being widely criticized within the population of the Arab countriesfor what is viewed as an absolute betrayal of the Gaza Palestinians.
Even Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has been regarded as atraitor to his own people for blaming Hamas for the suffering of thepeople of Gaza. Palestinians are also well aware of Abbas' pastperceived betrayals in conniving with Israel and the US to sidelinethe democratically elected Hamas government, culminating in acounter-coup by Hamas in which it expelled Fatah (the military wing ofAbbas' Palestine Authority) from the Gaza Strip. While his apparentgoal was to weaken Hamas and strengthen his own position, thePalestinians and other Arabs in the Middle East are so outraged atAbbas that it is unlikely he will be able to govern effectively.
Lie #5) Israel is not responsible for civilian deaths because itwarned the Palestinians of Gaza to flee areas that might be targeted.
Israel claims it sent radio and telephone text messages to residentsof Gaza warning them to flee from the coming bombardment. But thepeople of Gaza have nowhere to flee to. They are trapped within theGaza Strip. It is by Israeli design that they cannot escape across theborder. It is by Israeli design that they have no food, water, or fuelby which to survive. It is by Israeli design that hospitals in Gazahave no electricity and few medical supplies with which to treat theinjured and save lives. And Israel has bombed vast areas of Gaza,targeting civilian infrastructure and other sites with protectedstatus under international law. No place is safe within the GazaStrip.
Jeremy R. Hammond is the editor of Foreign Policy Journal, a websitededicated to providing news, critical analysis, and opinion commentaryon U.S. foreign policy from outside of the standard framework offeredby government officials and the mainstream corporate media,particularly with regard to the "war on terrorism" and events in theMiddle East. He has also written for numerous other onlinepublications. You can contact him at jeremy@foreignpolicyjournal.com.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------




Above article on the 5 lies was accurately portrayed and much softeron Israel and the Arabs than I am. Israel wouldn't have the guts topull this operation with doing an international checkout and havingthe Arabs onside. Even Iran has gone soft. The Iranian Presidentpossibly doesn't want a nuclear conflagration but as well, Israelclaims 14 Hebrew tribes are represented in Iran. One wonders about allthe talk. Israel attacked Iraq's reactors back in the late '80's forIsrael and was rewarded by Iran paying 10 times the value of weapons,planes, materiel and spares for hundreds of millions of dollars inarms. On wonders again about all the talk.
An Australian government back in the late 80's when plans such as theinvasion of Iraq, the shift into a new world order assassination modefor the USA ultimately through Reagan and the requirement ofgovernments to "privatise" taxpayer funded assets. The SouthAustralian Government was complicit in Israel's international crimeswas complicit in these illegal transactions as well and Missiles werebeing carried illegally and unknown to most of its citizens out ofAustralia on domestic flights.
Israel's aggression and covert actions are usually well done and it iswell known by those who bother to find out anything outside theendless tapes of Israeli propaganda, an assassination machine with noconscience whatsoever. Germany, supporting Israel's war crimes rightnow has forgotten Israel assassinated three of its politicians, onemost horribly and very personally by 5 Mossad killers, one a woman andvideotaped the appalling operation, simply because these people were"in the way" of Israeli crimes in Germany
People are comparing this year, Israel with Nazi Germany, that'scloser than they think as Israel more accurately termed " the Kingdomof Zion" was founded through very close and amicable cooperationbetween German Zionists and Hitler.
A lot of organising was very well done, a lot of money changed handsand a lot of money flowed in to the jewish sector of Palestine throughGerman assistance
Now well-renowned for its treachery and inhumanity Israel alsoeducated Bush's people on the torturing of New world Order victims.
"New Order was a term used by Stern when referring to the "Old Order"of jews, who were not wanting to leave Germany in the 1930's which hedidn't give a tinker's cuss about and he said so, and so they died.These people didn't "taje advantage" of the possibilities of leaving,and they were jewss attached to their country, not Zionists seekingcontrol of Palestine. Along with other "undesirables" who precededthem They were sacrificed, an holocaust was offered for the new worldorder to flourish
One of the reasons WW11 was commenced was because of Hitler's furywith jewish business which had declared economic war on Germany, ablockade, whilst he was even negotiating transfers to Palestine withthe Zionist. He spoke of his opinion of the control of "InternationalJewry" but until recently evidence of the blockade and the effect onGermany was well hidden other than from some investigative scientists.This and the Zoionist-Nazi alliance are tow of the most shockingsecrets hidden from us for so long.
Zionists are not "Jews" but a fanatical political force brought intobeing very much by de Rothschild's plans in the 18th century for worlddomination by Bankers and financiers. A hundred million people mighthave lived were it not for that Jewish blockade. A lot of things mayhave happened if Hitler was not tipped over the edge.
Much later when some 100,000 or so zionists had left for Palestine theold order jews were dying on the street and in camps as was well knownto the Allies and USA by late 1942. As later post war the Palestinianswere desperate about the massive illegal zionist immigration . Theyhad no illusions about the future but they never anticipated theterrorist invasion and massacres which commenced in June 1947 anderupted into mass murder and displacement and land grabs in 1948.
Stern the jewish terrorist was organizing, during those WW11 times, aZionist complicity with the Nazis to attack Britain in the MiddleEast. British politicians generally supported the Balfour concept ofgiving away someone else's land to a zionist state and so the zionistswere playing both ends. Once you understand the relationship betweenthe Nazis and the Zionists this seems quite natural.
Here we are now, right now, with unspeakable crimes against humanityhaving been exercised in Iraq by Bush's orders on Israel's bidding (asrevealed and predicted by Ari ben Menashe Profits of War, 1991)finding that the Israeli lies, some few of which you mention, arebeing spouted around the world by Washington and its unwholesomegovernment allies, Britain and Australia in particular and Europeunder France and German and Polish and Chek conspiracy to disseminatethe Israeli lies, which like Bush's have plenty of rebuttal.
They don't care any more about blatant lies and public massmurder...we are all under control, we talk and we do nothing. Thosewho have the courage of their convictions are labeled traitors andterrorists and imprisoned and tortured. Great democracy underWashington, isn't it...? That's the sort of government under which ourchildren will suffer.
Interestingly the strongest objection has come from el Salvador'sex-priest in the UN and the Malaysian Prime Minister and some AfricanStates. Most of the rest are mumbling Zionist lies.
By and large apart from Israel's bully boys standing over andterrorising the "Destiny", in International waters where Israel has nomore rights than a fisherman, from some brave aid workers attemptingto bring supplies to Gaza nothing is happening. Some Zionistsupporters are writing of these people being better drowned and evenpretending they were importing weapons. In any event it was no rightfor Israel to start bullying them.
Disgustingly people are talking of "cease fires" as though thePalestinians were engaging the zionist forces rather than firing somerockets at cities which zion has destroyed and rebuilt....withvirtually no casualties. The arriving of the little aid vessel wouldhave stolen Israel's thunder in Israel's theatrical " aid forhumanity" performance.
Nothing to save them is happening as Palestinians are murdered,children and mothers splattered by guided rockets and killed bysnipers. The Kingdom of Zion is a law unto itself. It ignores everyorder of the UN and has done so since inception. No one apart fromreal people gives a damn. Bigotry is at an all time high as foul andignorant letters to the Jerusalem Post and other bigotry welcomingnews services, show.
By holding Gaza in terror rather than occupying it totally it can moreslowly exterminate them and by deliberately targeting the women andchildren, which several killings show it surely does do, encouragePalestinians to 'transfer" elsewhere and seemingly abandon Gaza to the"good old" boys in the Kingdom of Zion.
These crafty Zionist manipulators are not acting alone but are a partof the mosaic of the new world order's four branches, Finance Control,Deception, Assassination.
Yes they are all liars, yes the Israeli's broke the cease fireagreement, yes the attack has been planned for a long time, they say 6months, I say 20 years ago, just brought up to date earlier in theyear to meet the circumstances.
The people being turned into headless, limbless corpses and lamed andmaddened pieces of humanity are suffering because their electedgovernment is defending them with virtually no weaponry and certainlynothing of value to resist zion's start of the art technology suppliedfree by Washington..
Israel continues its interminable lies, Bush and his storm-troopersecho them .They are all a part of the same "new order" and while I sitand write people, subject to all sorts of vile insults about theircourage and "hiding behind children" are being blown to pieces by amassively overwhelming force which was too gutless to attack thestarving, under-armed HAMAS until 5 days of "softening up" and shockwere performed.
It's easy to be a killer with International impunity isn't it...andwith the victims derided by international conspirators with Israel andwithout hospitals schools, police, sewage, water and with few safeplaces to hide. Now zion can go in and pretend the dead men women andchildren were not killed in air strikes but attacking the "good guys".We are all to blame for letting Israel get this far without blockadingit and forcing it back to the 1946 boundaries
I have no respect at all anymore, not a shred, for the Kingdom of Zionand it's liars and its IDF. I have none for George Bush either orBrown or Rudd or the other gutless politicians, fawning and fore-locktugging to the Zionists and Washington. I have to say that whilst Ihope no one dies on either side in my heart I hope Hamas kicks theirbacksides right back to Tel Aviv. As far as I am concerned theinternational war crimes Tribunal should be trying Bush's gang andIsrael's killers right now.
Palestine is the Victim, Palestine was attacked many times in the landgrabs since 1947. That's the short story of the reality . The onlystory holding truth. The Kingdom of Zion is determined to control whatit calls, ridiculously . "our lands". which it hasn't "owned" for morethan 660 years of the last 5000, 10,000 years.



Readmore...

Followers

 
x

Get Our Latest Posts Via Email - It's Free

Enter your email address:

TwitterFacebookGoogle PlusLinkedInRSS FeedEmail

Delivered ByFeedBurner